TQC, in my con law notes I have indicated to myself in vicious shorthand that a particular case (Brandenberg v Ohio) took place "post CR&V acts." Neither I nor my con law professor know what I could've meant by the CR&V acts and the rest of the internet has failed me.
Do you know?
Do you ever screw yourself over by using obscure acronyms in your own notes? Thankfully I know what I mean by RBT, SST, CPDT, PP, etc.